1. Purpose
This Operating Procedure defines the standardized method for performing a specific business, information-security, technology, compliance, or operational activity.
The procedure should explain who performs the activity, what is performed, how it is performed, when it is performed, what evidence is generated, and how exceptions are handled.
Core Principle
Define → Assign → Perform → Record → Verify → Review → Improve
2. Procedure Information
| Field | Details |
|---|---|
| Procedure Title | |
| Procedure ID | |
| Procedure Owner | |
| Process Owner | |
| Department | |
| Version | |
| Effective Date | |
| Review Date | |
| Classification | |
| Status | Draft / Approved / Retired |
| Related Policy | |
| Related Standard | |
| Related Risk | |
| Approved By |
3. Scope
This procedure applies to:
- People
- Processes
- Systems
- Applications
- Infrastructure
- Information
- Third parties
Included
Excluded
Applicability
4. Objective
The objectives of this procedure are to:
- Establish a consistent operating process
- Define responsibilities
- Reduce operational and security risk
- Ensure required controls are performed
- Generate appropriate evidence
- Support compliance requirements
- Enable monitoring and review
- Reduce dependency on individual knowledge
5. Preconditions
Before starting the procedure, verify that:
☐ Required approval exists
☐ Required access is available
☐ Required information is available
☐ Required systems are available
☐ Required personnel are assigned
☐ Relevant policies are understood
☐ Security requirements are identified
☐ Dependencies are available
☐ Required tools are available
6. Roles and Responsibilities
| Role | Responsibility |
|---|---|
| Procedure Owner | |
| Process Owner | |
| Performer | |
| Reviewer | |
| Approver | |
| Security/Compliance | |
| System Owner | |
| Third Party |
7. Required Inputs
Identify information, approvals, systems, or documents required to perform the procedure.
| Input | Source | Owner | Required? |
|---|---|---|---|
8. Required Tools and Systems
| Tool/System | Purpose | Owner | Access Required |
|---|---|---|---|
Examples may include:
- AWS
- Microsoft 365
- GitHub
- Jira
- SIEM
- Ticketing system
- HR system
- GRC platform
- Vulnerability scanner
- Backup platform
9. Procedure Steps
Document the actual operational process.
| Step | Activity | Responsible | Input | Output/Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ||||
| 2 | ||||
| 3 | ||||
| 4 | ||||
| 5 |
Step 1
Activity:
Responsible:
Method:
Expected Result:
Evidence:
Step 2
Activity:
Responsible:
Method:
Expected Result:
Evidence:
Step 3
Activity:
Responsible:
Method:
Expected Result:
Evidence:
10. Security Requirements
The procedure must address applicable security requirements.
☐ Authentication
☐ MFA
☐ Least privilege
☐ Segregation of duties
☐ Confidentiality
☐ Integrity
☐ Availability
☐ Encryption
☐ Logging
☐ Monitoring
☐ Secure information handling
☐ Access restrictions
☐ Data retention
☐ Secure disposal
Additional Security Requirements
11. Information Handling
Identify information used or generated during the procedure.
| Information | Classification | Handling Requirement | Storage | Retention |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Do not collect or retain information that is unnecessary for the activity.
12. Access Requirements
Document the minimum access required.
| System | Role | Permission | Justification | Approval |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Access should follow:
Need → Authorization → Least Privilege → Authentication → Monitoring → Review
13. Verification and Quality Check
After completing the activity, verify that the expected result has been achieved.
☐ Activity completed
☐ Required control performed
☐ Output reviewed
☐ Evidence generated
☐ Errors identified and addressed
☐ Required approval obtained
☐ Records updated
Verification Method
Reviewer
Verification Evidence
14. Evidence and Records
Identify the records generated by the procedure.
| Record/Evidence | Owner | Storage Location | Retention |
|---|---|---|---|
Examples:
- Tickets
- Approval records
- System logs
- Screenshots
- Reports
- Review records
- Access records
- Change records
- Scan reports
- Meeting records
- System-generated evidence
Evidence should be protected from unauthorized modification or deletion.
15. Exceptions and Deviations
If the procedure cannot be performed as defined:
- Record the deviation.
- Identify the reason.
- Assess the associated risk.
- Apply compensating controls where appropriate.
- Obtain required approval.
- Record the exception.
- Define corrective action where necessary.
Exception Record
| Exception | Reason | Risk | Compensating Control | Approval | Expiry |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
16. Failure Handling
If the procedure fails or produces an unexpected result:
☐ Stop the activity where necessary
☐ Protect affected information/assets
☐ Notify the responsible owner
☐ Record the issue
☐ Assess impact
☐ Escalate where required
☐ Correct the immediate problem
☐ Initiate incident management where applicable
☐ Initiate corrective action where required
Escalation Contact
17. Security Incident Handling
If a security incident is identified during execution:
Stop/Contain → Report → Investigate → Recover → Record → Improve
Do not attempt actions outside the individual’s authorized responsibility.
Incident Reporting Method
18. Change Management
Changes to this procedure or the underlying process should be evaluated before implementation.
Consider:
- Security impact
- Business impact
- Compliance impact
- System impact
- Information impact
- Access impact
- Third-party impact
- Training requirements
- Evidence requirements
Change Approval
| Change | Impact | Owner | Approval | Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
19. Frequency
Define when the procedure must be performed.
☐ Continuous
☐ Daily
☐ Weekly
☐ Monthly
☐ Quarterly
☐ Semi-annually
☐ Annually
☐ Event-driven
☐ Other: __________
Trigger
20. Monitoring
Where appropriate, monitor whether the procedure is being performed effectively.
| Metric | Target | Frequency | Owner |
|---|---|---|---|
Examples:
- Completion rate
- Exception rate
- Error rate
- Overdue activities
- Failed activities
- Security incidents
- Control failures
- SLA compliance
21. Compliance Requirements
Identify requirements applicable to the procedure.
☐ ISO/IEC 27001
☐ Customer requirements
☐ Contractual requirements
☐ Privacy requirements
☐ Legal requirements
☐ Regulatory requirements
☐ Internal policy requirements
☐ Security requirements
Applicable Requirements
22. Control Mapping
Where the procedure supports an ISMS control, document the relationship.
| Requirement/Control | Procedure Activity | Evidence |
|---|---|---|
The procedure should support the organization’s applicable control requirements without treating the procedure itself as proof that the control is effective.
23. Training and Awareness
Determine whether personnel performing this procedure require training.
☐ Training required
☐ No specific training required
☐ Role-specific training
☐ Security awareness
☐ Technical training
☐ Refresher training
Training Requirement
Training Evidence
24. Third-Party Execution
If a third party performs part of the procedure:
☐ Third party identified
☐ Responsibilities defined
☐ Security requirements communicated
☐ Access controlled
☐ Confidentiality requirements addressed
☐ Evidence requirements defined
☐ Performance monitored
☐ Offboarding requirements defined
25. Business Continuity
If this procedure supports a critical business process, define what happens when the normal process or system is unavailable.
Primary Process
Alternative Process
Manual Workaround
Recovery Requirement
26. Review and Maintenance
The procedure owner should review this procedure based on:
- Defined review frequency
- Significant process changes
- Security incidents
- Audit findings
- Regulatory changes
- Technology changes
- Organizational changes
- Supplier changes
- Lessons learned
Review Record
| Review Date | Reviewer | Changes Required | Result | Approval |
|---|---|---|---|---|
27. Procedure Effectiveness
Determine whether the procedure achieves its intended objective.
Consider:
☐ Procedure is consistently followed
☐ Activities are completed on time
☐ Required evidence exists
☐ Errors are controlled
☐ Security requirements are met
☐ Exceptions are understood
☐ Findings are reducing
☐ Users understand the procedure
☐ Procedure remains practical
☐ Procedure supports business requirements
Effectiveness Assessment
28. Findings and Corrective Actions
| Finding | Risk | Root Cause | Corrective Action | Owner | Due Date | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Corrective actions should be tracked until implementation and effectiveness are verified.
29. Document Control
Version History
| Version | Date | Change | Author | Approved By |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1.0 | Initial version | |||
Document Status
☐ Draft
☐ Under Review
☐ Approved
☐ Superseded
☐ Retired
30. Related Documents
| Document | Relationship |
|---|---|
| Information Security Policy | Governing policy |
| Risk Assessment | Identifies relevant risks |
| Statement of Applicability | Identifies applicable controls |
| Work Instruction | Provides detailed task instructions |
| Checklist | Supports execution/verification |
| Record/Register | Provides evidence |
| Incident Procedure | Handles security incidents |
| Change Procedure | Controls changes |
| Business Continuity Plan | Addresses disruption |
| Supplier Procedure | Addresses third-party activities |
31. Approval
Procedure Owner: __________________________
Process Owner: __________________________
Security/Compliance Reviewer: __________________________
Approver: __________________________
Approval Date: __________________________
Effective Date: __________________________
Next Review Date: __________________________
32. AWS SaaS Startup Example
Procedure
Title: AWS Production Access Procedure
Purpose
Define how employees and approved third parties receive, use, review, and revoke access to AWS production environments.
Preconditions
☐ Business need identified
☐ Manager approval obtained
☐ System owner approval obtained
☐ Security requirements reviewed
☐ MFA available
Process
| Step | Activity | Responsible | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | User submits access request | User | Access ticket |
| 2 | Business owner validates need | Manager | Approval |
| 3 | System owner validates permission | System Owner | Approval |
| 4 | IAM role assigned | Cloud Admin | IAM record |
| 5 | MFA verified | Security/IT | Authentication record |
| 6 | Access provided | Cloud Admin | Ticket |
| 7 | Access reviewed periodically | System Owner | Access review |
| 8 | Access removed when no longer required | Cloud Admin | Revocation evidence |
Security Requirements
- Individual accounts
- MFA
- Least privilege
- No shared administrator accounts
- Privileged activity logging
- Temporary access where practical
- Periodic access review
- Immediate revocation when employment or business need ends
Evidence
- Access request
- Approval
- IAM configuration
- MFA status
- Access review
- Revocation record
33. Startup-Friendly Operating Procedure Model
A startup does not need a 30-page procedure for every activity.
For a simple activity, the minimum useful structure may be:
1. Purpose
Why the procedure exists.
2. Owner
Who is responsible.
3. Trigger
When it starts.
4. Steps
What people actually do.
5. Security Requirements
What must not be missed.
6. Evidence
What proves the activity happened.
7. Exceptions
What happens when the normal process cannot be followed.
8. Review
When the procedure is reassessed.
This keeps the ISMS practical rather than creating unnecessary documentation.
34. Common Mistakes
Avoid:
- Creating procedures that nobody follows.
- Writing procedures that are too theoretical.
- Failing to identify the process owner.
- Not defining the trigger.
- Not defining the actual steps.
- Failing to identify required evidence.
- Giving excessive access to perform the procedure.
- Ignoring exceptions.
- Failing to define escalation.
- Keeping obsolete procedures available as current documents.
- Not reviewing procedures after major changes.
- Creating duplicate procedures for the same activity.
- Treating a procedure document as proof that the activity actually occurred.
- Creating excessive documentation that does not add operational value.
35. Relationship With the ISMS
Operating procedures translate policies and control requirements into day-to-day activities.
A typical relationship is:
Business Requirement → Risk → Policy → Control → Procedure → Activity → Evidence → Review → Improvement
For example:
Risk: Unauthorized production access
Policy: Access must be authorized and appropriately restricted
Control: Access is limited according to business need
Procedure: AWS Production Access Procedure
Activity: Request → Approve → Grant → Monitor → Review → Revoke
Evidence: Access ticket, approval, IAM record, review record, revocation record
36. ISO/IEC 27001 Connection
Operating procedures can support the organization’s ISMS by translating applicable information-security requirements and controls into repeatable operational activities.
The exact procedures required should be determined based on:
- ISMS scope
- Risk assessment
- Risk treatment
- Statement of Applicability
- Applicable controls
- Business requirements
- Legal and regulatory requirements
- Customer requirements
- Contractual obligations
- Operational complexity
ISO/IEC 27001 does not require an organization to create an identically named “Operating Procedure Template” for every activity.
The objective is to maintain the documented information necessary to support controlled operation and provide appropriate evidence of activities performed.
37. Audit Evidence Checklist
For an auditor, the organization should be able to demonstrate:
☐ Approved procedure
☐ Current version
☐ Defined owner
☐ Defined responsibilities
☐ Defined process steps
☐ Evidence of execution
☐ Required approvals
☐ Access controls
☐ Security requirements
☐ Exception records
☐ Incident records where applicable
☐ Corrective actions
☐ Periodic review
☐ Change history
☐ Evidence of effectiveness
38. Final Operating Procedure Audit Trail
For every important operating procedure, the organization should be able to answer:
Why does this procedure exist?
Who owns it?
When is it triggered?
Who performs it?
What exactly must be done?
What security requirements apply?
What information and systems are involved?
What evidence is generated?
What happens when something goes wrong?
How are exceptions handled?
How is effectiveness verified?
When was the procedure last reviewed?
Final Principle
A good operating procedure is not simply a document describing work. It creates a repeatable, controlled, and auditable way of performing the work.
